width = INT_MAX;
}
dat[3] = slwidth = width;
- *scanl = charstring_create (width);
+ *scanl = charstring_create (width < NMH_BUFSIZ ? width : NMH_BUFSIZ);
if (outnum)
umask(~m_gmprot());
datecomp = fmt_findcomp("date");
cptr = fmt_findcomp("folder");
if (cptr && folder)
- cptr->c_text = getcpy(folder);
+ cptr->c_text = mh_xstrdup(folder);
if (fmt_addcompentry("encrypted")) {
ncomps++;
}
* and it's our responsibility to free it.
*/
- nxtbuf = compbuffers = (char **) calloc((size_t) ncomps, sizeof(char *));
- if (nxtbuf == NULL)
- adios (NULL, "unable to allocate component buffers");
- used_buf = (struct comp **) calloc((size_t) (ncomps+1),
- sizeof(struct comp *));
- if (used_buf == NULL)
- adios (NULL, "unable to allocate component buffer stack");
+ nxtbuf = compbuffers = mh_xcalloc(ncomps, sizeof *nxtbuf);
+ used_buf = mh_xcalloc(ncomps + 1, sizeof *used_buf);
used_buf += ncomps+1; *--used_buf = 0;
rlwidth = bodycomp && (width > SBUFSIZ)
? min (width, NMH_BUFSIZ)
if (ferror(inb)) {
advise("read", "unable to"); /* "read error" */
return SCNFAT;
- } else {
- return SCNEOF;
}
+ return SCNEOF;
}
if (outnum) {
* The previous code here used to call m_getfld() using
* pointers to the underlying output stdio buffers to
* avoid the extra copy. Tests by Markus Schnalke show
- * no noticable performance loss on larger mailboxes
+ * no noticeable performance loss on larger mailboxes
* if we incur an extra copy, and messing around with
* internal stdio buffers is becoming more and more
* unportable as times go on. So from now on just deal
if (datecomp) {
if (! datecomp->c_text) {
if (datecomp->c_tws == NULL)
- datecomp->c_tws = (struct tws *)
- calloc((size_t) 1, sizeof(*datecomp->c_tws));
- if (datecomp->c_tws == NULL)
- adios (NULL, "unable to allocate tws buffer");
+ NEW0(datecomp->c_tws);
*datecomp->c_tws = *dlocaltime ((time_t *) &st.st_mtime);
datecomp->c_flags |= CF_DATEFAB|CF_TRUE;
} else {