From: David Levine <levinedl@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 02:35:23 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Added mention of "Reply to <address>?" prompt to repl(1) man
X-Git-Url: https://diplodocus.org/git/nmh/commitdiff_plain/475fef2edee9db3c63fc089df76f8e93e3d598cd?ds=sidebyside;hp=-c

Added mention of "Reply to <address>?" prompt to repl(1) man
page and code, as comment.  Suggested by Norm so that scripts
can depend on it.
---

475fef2edee9db3c63fc089df76f8e93e3d598cd
diff --git a/man/repl.man b/man/repl.man
index fe87c856..af41525b 100644
--- a/man/repl.man
+++ b/man/repl.man
@@ -179,8 +179,15 @@ switch modifies the action of
 switch by
 interactively asking you if each address that normally would be placed in
 the \*(lqTo:\*(rq and \*(lqcc:\*(rq list should actually be sent a copy.
-This is useful for special\-purpose replies.  Note that the position of
-the
+This is useful for special\-purpose replies.  The prompt format is
+.PP
+.RS 5
+Reply to
+.IR address ?
+.RE
+.PP
+That prompt will not change, so that scripts can rely on it.  Note
+that the position of the
 .B \-cc
 and
 .B \-nocc
diff --git a/uip/replsbr.c b/uip/replsbr.c
index 6a906b44..46ae7dc3 100644
--- a/uip/replsbr.c
+++ b/uip/replsbr.c
@@ -400,6 +400,8 @@ insert (struct mailname *np)
 	return 0;
 
     if (querysw) {
+        /* Don't change the "Reply to %s? " prompt format, so that
+           scripts can rely on it. */
 	snprintf (buffer, sizeof(buffer), "Reply to %s? ", adrformat (np));
 	if (!gans (buffer, anoyes))
 	return 0;