From 0a01282c77d958d15a135ade3fcd1ef6c57c7273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralph Corderoy <ralph@inputplus.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:04:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] inc/test-eom-align: rm(1) unwanted +inbox emails, not rmm(1).

Using rmm(1) is using the software under test.  And about 50 times
slower.
---
 test/inc/test-eom-align | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/inc/test-eom-align b/test/inc/test-eom-align
index 84b52c42..b1e8c65f 100755
--- a/test/inc/test-eom-align
+++ b/test/inc/test-eom-align
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ do_one_test_A () {
   sed -e '1,/^$/d' "$MH_TEST_DIR/Mail/inbox/12" > "$body2"
   check "$MH_TEST_DIR/eom-align.mbox.body" "$body1" 'keep first'
   check "$FILLER" "$body2" 'keep first'
-  rmm 11 12
+  rm "$MH_TEST_DIR/Mail/inbox/11" "$MH_TEST_DIR/Mail/inbox/12"
 }
 
 # do_one_test_B sz mbox_type
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ do_one_test_B () {
   body1="$MH_TEST_DIR/eom-align.inbox.body1"
   sed -e '1,/^$/d' "$MH_TEST_DIR/Mail/inbox/11" > "$body1"
   check "$MH_TEST_DIR/eom-align.mbox.body" "$body1" 'keep first'
-  rmm 11
+  rm "$MH_TEST_DIR/Mail/inbox/11"
 }
 
 # Cover a decent range around the stdio buffer size to make sure we catch
-- 
2.56.0