Remove the slightly legalistic 'in truth of fact', and bring the
mention of man whatnow into the preceding sentence.
The line 'If the draft already exists, comp will ask you as to the
disposition of the draft.' makes no sense to me, and I'm struggling
to make it make sense. If we put to one side the fact that I think
it's a broken sentence, I still haven't managed to get comp to
accept - or prompt me for - a 'replace' option when 'the draft
already exists', so I'm afraid I have to admit defeat here and seek
the wisdom of the elders.
-.TH COMP %manext1% "May 21, 2012" "%nmhversion%"
+.TH COMP %manext1% "December 16, 2016" "%nmhversion%"
.\"
.\" %nmhwarning%
.\"
.B comp
will invoke the
.B whatnow
-program. See
+program (see
.IR whatnow (1)
for a discussion of
-available options. The invocation of this program can be inhibited
+available options). The invocation of this program can be inhibited
by using the
.B \-nowhatnowproc
-switch. (In truth of fact, it is
-the
+switch. (In fact, it is the
.I whatnow
program which starts the initial edit. Hence,
.B \-nowhatnowproc